Comments Feed

Auburn News Correction

It quotes me as saying I want to "lower the cost of income." This, of course, makes no sense.
AUBURN NEWS CORRECTION

There was an article in the Auburn News about my campaign yesterday. It quotes me as saying I want to "lower the cost of income." This, of course, makes no sense. What it is supposed to say is that I want to "lower the cost of living."

Taxes, profits and interest rates (paid or collected) all combine to create inflation and raise the cost of living. Zero is a fixed point. As numbers get bigger, we get father away from zero. Zero is a state of perfect balance, where everyone has what they need, and not too much or too little. (A renaissance occurs when society is in balance because time is not linked to money.) As we get farther away from zero, income is always chasing the cost of living, but it can never catch up, which is why there are perpetual budget crises, it costs too much to do it right, etc.

The Federal Deficit is a huge "non-zero," which is the "prime imbalance" in our economic universe.

In a world where everyone is trying to make numbers bigger, I am saying the solution is to make the numbers smaller. ALL THREE NUMBERS, not just one of them, which is what most people proclaim. Raising taxes to cut "windfall" profits is as silly as cutting taxes to raise profits.

Mathematically it is the same event; one number goes up and another number goes down.

Rather than "buy low-sell high" we need to "buy low-sell low." That way goods and services move, but without creating inflation (and imbalances) in the process.

If you lower the cost of living, then you raise the standard of living.
|